In a nation of over 1.17 billion people and still counting, finding a lecherous and hideous criminal is a huge task. And then voting and electing him as our representatives even bigger.
But we faithfully have been doing it, after all what choice does the naive citizens have?
We don't understand how these criminal politicians have been eating up the very arteries of the country, while the judiciary and the executive have been simply sucking up to them...
Just for a better understanding of the citizens of our country, we conducted a complete full-scale research where we evaluated the microeconomic measures such as the value of gifts received and the consumption-income gap of law, order, and administrative officials, while a co-relation in the subjective perception-of the defunct brain indices of citizens was weighed against the quantitative estimates of bribery taken by the criminal politicians.
Using a regression discontinuity design, we are now clearly able to say that a criminal politician would further weaken the governance, while corruption becomes an accepted practice.
f(m �� ^m) �� b + b + (m �� ^m)T = (f + T)(m �� ^m
f(m �� ^m) �� b =
b + (m �� ^m)T. By (2), this implies that:
b = 1/2 (f �� T)m
Hence, b = 0
As per the calculations, the genius in you can now clearly see that Criminal politicians should not be elected.
India Shining, oh! really!
As per Election Commission estimates, 1,500 candidates in the 1996 parliamentary election had criminal records and 40 of them got elected to the 11th Lok Sabha.
In the state legislatures, out of the 4,072 sitting members of the legislative assembly in all the states, more than 700 have criminal records.
The 14th Lok Sabha (the lower house of the parliament of India) has 125 members with criminal background. The Lok Sabha has a total of 545 members, including the Speaker
By criminal background we mean, serious charges of murder, rape, kidnapping and extortion.
No comments:
Post a Comment